The Lincolnshire Bird Club http://lbcarchive.co.uk/forum/ |
|
Wildlife photographer of the year winner disqualified http://lbcarchive.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11604 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Nick Clayton [ Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Wildlife photographer of the year winner disqualified |
I found this quite a surprise: http://www.suomenluonto.fi/bbcs-nature- ... llegations http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit-us/whats-on/ ... tement.jsp http://www.photoradar.com/news/story/wi ... squalified |
Author: | Dean Eades [ Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wildlife photographer of the year winner disqualified |
Were my Gannets ok Nick ? |
Author: | Nick Clayton [ Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wildlife photographer of the year winner disqualified |
Dean Eades wrote: Were my Gannets ok Nick ? Looked a bit plastic to me Dean |
Author: | John Clarkson [ Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wildlife photographer of the year winner disqualified |
Worth investigating surely? John |
Author: | Graham Catley [ Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wildlife photographer of the year winner disqualified |
maybe a comment on the ability of the judges to see wood beyond the trees -- now officially disqualified he still claims it was not a set up with a tame wolf in spite of all the evidence -- I noticed today that they had already gone to print with the portfolio 19 before the disqualification so the book is a poor indictment of the competition --as anyone who looks at BBC Wildlife will know this sort of use of captive animals and birds is now almost universal amongst many well known photographers, the mag now even puts a little captive note next to the photographer's name BUT surely a WILDLIFE magazine should be using pictures of wildlife not captive tame animals -- the lust for profit seems to rule the majority of the world |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |