| The Lincolnshire Bird Club http://lbcarchive.co.uk/forum/ |
|
| Donna Nook, 4/8. http://lbcarchive.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22888 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Geoff Williams [ Tue Aug 04, 2015 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Donna Nook, 4/8. |
Besides the Black Stork already reported, also seen was an Osprey, 1 Little Tern and a few Sandwich and Common Tern on the saltmarsh on the high tide. Geoff |
|
| Author: | Phil Espin [ Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Donna Nook, 4/8. |
Thanks for putting the news out about the Black Stork so quick Geoff. Got any thoughts about how many are about at the moment, its got to be at least 3. |
|
| Author: | Geoff Williams [ Tue Aug 04, 2015 10:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Donna Nook, 4/8. |
Phil Espin wrote: Thanks for putting the news out about the Black Stork so quick Geoff. Got any thoughts about how many are about at the moment, its got to be at least 3. Hi Phil, Always glad to help. I can only go on what RBA says, although the Conisholme report appears to be a mistake by RBA. There seems to be two in Lincs, 1) Reads Island/ Alkboro, 2) Donna Nook/ Theddlethorpe though where it is now is any ones guess. Spurn 1 and Notts. 1. Any chance the Reads Island bird is different from the Alkboro one, GPC might know? Geoff |
|
| Author: | Phil Espin [ Wed Aug 05, 2015 8:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Donna Nook, 4/8. |
I hadn't realised the Bird Guides Conisholme report was a mistake, doesn't look like they've retracted it. What makes you think it was a mistake? I agree with your summary otherwise. Anyone else got a view? |
|
| Author: | Andrew Chick [ Wed Aug 05, 2015 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Donna Nook, 4/8. |
Photos on Facebook by Terry West at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater |
|
| Author: | Geoff Williams [ Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Donna Nook, 4/8. |
Phil Espin wrote: I hadn't realised the Bird Guides Conisholme report was a mistake, doesn't look like they've retracted it. What makes you think it was a mistake? I agree with your summary otherwise.
Anyone else got a view? |
|
| Author: | Geoff Williams [ Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Donna Nook, 4/8. |
Phil Espin wrote: I hadn't realised the Bird Guides Conisholme report was a mistake, doesn't look like they've retracted it. What makes you think it was a mistake? I agree with your summary otherwise. Anyone else got a view? i had contradictive news from two lots of birders which said that another birder had seen the bird at Conisholme and Mablethorpe at the same time, so either he'd seen it twice that morning or the Conisholme report was in error. Geoff |
|
| Author: | Graham Catley [ Wed Aug 05, 2015 10:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Donna Nook, 4/8. |
Contra previous reports these photos appear to be of a juvenile, as expected in this influx. Apparently a caravaner staying at Alkborough photographed that bird over the camp site so hopefully it will be ageable as well. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|