Stuart,
I was interested in reading your post on the delicate subject of illegal butterfly releases. Along with the committee of the Lincs Branch of BC and some 'ordinary' members, I not only know the name of the man allegedly responsible for the major Chambers releases, including recent ones; I also know his home town and his preferred mode of travel to release sites.
He is not the only release activist. For example, another man, whose identity is also known to the committee, was responsible for the release of the Silver Washed Fritillary pupae in Southrey Wood in 2012 and possibly in other years.
As one can imagine, illegal release is a nightmare for the county butterfly recorder. Is such and such a Lincs sighting of a rare butterfly of one that arrived in Lincs 'naturally' or is it another release? In that way, a possible natural spread of a certain rare species may be considered release-based or perhaps it's down to 'on balance, we believe...'
Inevitably, questions have arisen over the Robert's Field Dark Green Fritillaries. Are they releases or are they, perhaps, the result of a natural spread from a neighbouring county?
By and large, birders don't have to deal with deliberate releases. We have the historical records of the fraudulent collecting and recording of rare birds (eg. the infamous Hastings Rarities saga) and of Colonel Richard Henry Meinerzhagen's fraudulent activities, but both events date back to the early years of the 20th century. On the other hand, there's not much chance of a Mr.X releasing a batch of half a dozen Blue-cheeked Bee-eaters at Gibraltar Point or a Black Lark or two at Frampton.
Freddy
|