The Lincolnshire Bird Club

The LBC Forum. To register on this forum YOU must NOW be a member of the LBC - see Membership Page for details.
To join the LBC Forum you must be a Member of the Lincolnshire Bird Club - Click here for Membership Information
If you would like to post an item, but ARE NOT a forum member please submit information using the Record Form: if suitable the information will be posted on the LBC Forum on your behalf.

It is currently Mon Apr 21, 2025 11:08 pm

LBC Homepage - The Photo Album - Submit a Record (for Non-members)/ or Request - LBC Forum Information and Access Help - Forum Information


All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:26 pm
Posts: 601
Location: Frampton Marsh
I havn't seen this bird at all, but just a word of caution about the ageing of raptors (and other large birds in general actually).

I'm reliably informed that fieldworkers in Scandanavia now do not and cannot accurately age White-tailed Eagles. They now just stick to juvenile, sub-adult and adult. In fact, my same source has told me that Forsman himself has learnt shed loads since writing his book, and has proved himself wrong on a few things (not sure exactly what though!). Still, its by far the best we have, and hopefully he'll do an update soon.

The same goes for gulls, now its been proved by ringing recoveries that Herring Gulls can retain signs of immaturity long past what we would have called 4th winter.

Just a note that it might not be worth pinning to much hope on accurately ageing this bird, as a) it might not be accurate, and b) it probably wont tell us very much anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 3:03 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Peterborough
Another word of caution has to be fact that its very risky trying to judge plumage tones from photographs. In russells perched shots the bird looks very warm toned, the same is also true of Steves shot on a pylon. One thing we have to be careful of is colour saturation in these photographs. For sure Russels shots (point and shoot camera) will have in-camera processing that bumps up the saturation levels well above actual levels. The same might also be true of Steves shot depending on whether he has taken a RAW image or JPEG. If Steve has taken a JPEG colour saturation and contrast will both be boosted. To be honest normally I increase sauration when processing my RAW images. The pic link below which I posted in July was a RAW image which has been converted to JPEG and has had the saturation slightly boosted (manually)during the conversion from RAW to JPEG. This pic doesn't look particually warm on the upperparts to me, acknowleged the pic was taken on a cloudy day.

Secondly the brightness of a photo as adjusted in photoshop will also obviously either make the kite look darker or lighter depending on how far the exposure slider is moved.


http://www.kevindurose.co.uk/2007_07_01 ... chive.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:31 pm
Posts: 135
Location: Deeping St James
steve wrote:
It also says intermediates between nominate and lineatus occur in E Europe and east wards and can be overall reddish, these are often seen over Israel and mistaken for Red Kites, has any one seen these type of birds over Israel? is this bird from further east. Could it be an interbreeding migrans-lineatus that would account for the rufous tones, and pale head .
If lineatus can make it here why not an inbreed from the wide interbreeding zone between the two.


Also these birds over israel only show 5 primaries
From Forsman, Black is known to have hybridized repeatedly with Red in the wild.


Steve/all,
Have you looked at Kev's comparative shots with two Black Kite photos he took in Spain? I personally can't see why this isn't just a Black Kite, to be honest I haven't seen any satisfying arguments for it being a Red x Black Kite (nor do I think it is a migrans/lineatus 'hybrid').

I think Grahams detailed look at the bird show this bird to be a pure Black Kite and Kev's photos show to be nothing too unusual.

I think its important to realise that if this bird was a Red x Black then it would show some Red Kite plumage and bare parts features, which this bird does not (no more than Black Kites usually do anyway).

cheers
Will


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:29 am 
Offline
Web Master
Web Master
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:25 pm
Posts: 2180
Location: Fulbeck, Grantham
The following information from Derick Evans,

From our position and at a great distance, the bird looked extremely long winged and flew very gracefully. Driving around to get a better view of the bird, we of course expected the long reported Black Kite. When it appeared directly above us and very close, my first thought was great views at last, my second was how Red the body and really pale the head was, almost Red Kite-is.
As it hung in the wind then slowly flew away from our position, elegantly banking from side to side it showed the diagnostic, diagonal wing patches as expected.
Though at first sight a rather uniform upperwing. The upperwing coverts seemed strangely Reddish-brown at times.
At rest (On the floor) the wing tips easily reached the tip of the tail. The tail was not as reported at all too forked for a Black Kite but facially, the bird could be said to look very Red Kite-like to me.
It was also noted more when at rest that the shoulders seemed brightly pattered for Adult Blk. Kite, with contrasting darker feather centres. is this unusual for Blk. Kite?

In flight, while expecting the upper wing of a black kite to appear more uniform than red Kite. On the Nocton bird the median upperwing coverts had a distinctly contrasting and Rufous pattern, which was often visible from far away. Black Kite should/would appear more uniform.
Phil took several pictures and I have looked through the Dick Forsman's Raptors of Europe & Middle East. Jury still out.

Derick Evans

_________________
-----------------------------------------------------
Andrew Chick
Website: http://www.forktail.co.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:31 am 
Offline
Web Master
Web Master
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:25 pm
Posts: 2180
Location: Fulbeck, Grantham
The following reply is from the Scottish Red Kite Project

Hi Andrew

Your query about hybrid Black/Red Kite has been forwarded to me in Inverness as I was the person responsible for recording this event in 2006 in Highland Region.

A male Black Kite had been annually visiting the Highlands since 2002 and first made a breeding attempt in 2005 with a Red Kite but failed. It usually turned up in April and stayed until August when it presumably migrated to traditional winter quarters in Africa. In 2006, it appeared again in mid-April but it wasn't until late June that I found it mated with a wing-tagged 6-year old female Red Kite with a nest containing 2 large young. Both these were ringed and wing-tagged and they fledged successfully in late July. They were not seen again and I assumed they had migrated like their father.

However within a couple of months, it soon became apparent that the experimental method used in 2006 for attaching the wing tags to the wing using a pin and spring stud (similar to pin badges) was a total failure as several radio-tagged young Red Kites appearing at communal roost during the autumn were found to have lost both wing-tags. Lost tags were found on the woodland floor below the roosts. We now assume that all the young kites wing-tagged in 2006 have lost them as none have been seen since last year.

So what I am saying is that the absence of wing-tags on the Lincolnshire bird does not rule out the likelihood of it being one of the Highland hybrids. The presence of a leg ring would raise the possibility that it is a Highland bird. Furthermore, the presence of a pale head of the individual photographed, does suggest that this bird is at least in it's second year and therefore, possibly born in 2006. Lots of ifs and buts - it all depends on the leg ring and the number on it!

Wouldn't it be marvelous if it was one of the Highland hybrids?

Thank you for contacting us and good luck in your quest.

Brian

_________________
-----------------------------------------------------
Andrew Chick
Website: http://www.forktail.co.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:43 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 716
Location: Saltfleet and Tipton, West Mids.
So if I do get to see it I can have two ticks for one bird. :lol:
Incidently the UK400 Rare bird alert report for 30th Oct. says that the dubious Black Kite is paired with a Buzzard! Is this correct?
Geoff


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:23 pm 
Offline
Associate PBC Member

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:48 pm
Posts: 645
Location: Langtoft
geoff williams wrote:
So if I do get to see it I can have two ticks for one bird. :lol:
Incidently the UK400 Rare bird alert report for 30th Oct. says that the dubious Black Kite is paired with a Buzzard! Is this correct?
Geoff


Don't listen to a word the UK400 says - its all crap and speculation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:16 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 364
Through out its stay its also paired with a Marsh harrier, sat close to each other in a field, grappled with an Hobby does that count, or its just a Gay Black, Red Black Kite.
PS this is a joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:58 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:20 pm
Posts: 1667
The tail was not as reported at all too forked for a Black Kite

Image

Was he looking at a different bird?

an the lack of a BTO ring rules out the chance of this being one of the Scottish birds (cracking story of falling tags though)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:16 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:18 pm
Posts: 1215
Location: scunthorpe
I will repeat my submission again,has anybody got close enough to count the six prominent fingers which according to mr forsman a black kite usually has?
Regards,
ps,the photo gpc shows appears to have five!!!
Roger.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:31 pm
Posts: 135
Location: Deeping St James
birddog wrote:
I will repeat my submission again,has anybody got close enough to count the six prominent fingers which according to mr forsman a black kite usually has?
Regards,
ps,the photo gpc shows appears to have five!!!
Roger.


Check out smurfbirds rare for photos when this bird first arrived in Norfolk for your answer....

Will


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:41 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:20 pm
Posts: 1667
I could be wrong but I think p1 is still growing here? the shots have gone to a higher sphere now so we await further definition.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:59 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:18 pm
Posts: 1215
Location: scunthorpe
Conceeded!!still does not answer my main question abot the lincs bird,
regards,rog.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 8:41 am 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 364
What was your main Question, i forgot


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 3:03 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Peterborough
Birddog, please stop going on about 6 fingers this was established back in May. The bird has been in active moult since then. See my link which I have supplied before, below and count for yourself. As Will and GPC have said, no one has put forward a convicing arguement for the bird being anything other than a black kite.

Four reasons why this bird looks to be a normally plumaged black kite

1. Tail is not too forked for black kite

2. bird lacks even a hint of pale window in underwings, actually less than on most black kites.

3. breast/belly is exactly the right colouration for black kite

4. structure/flight action appears to be right for black kite.

Could it be possible that some folks have seen a juv red kite????

Can someone supply 1 reason why this is not a normal black kite and we can investigate.


http://www.kevindurose.co.uk/uploaded_i ... 782905.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites