Freddy Johnson wrote:
James,
You may, as you say, see the argument from both sides but I'm afraid the content of your post as written, perhaps unwittingly but nevertheless transparently, expresses in that post an obvious point of view from just the one side.
Anyway, re your two points.....from someone else who says he can see the argument from both sides :
1. Is there really any correlation between the vicious Mink indiscriminately 'killing the wildlife' and a seemingly harmless Duck that is purported to fly the 1000 miles or so to Spain for the winter....and particularly to seduce a single species ... the compliant WH Duck ? ie, Rampant Murder as opposed to mere Seduction.
2. If you think that Spain/France/Germany would EVER consider culling a bird species in their own country that was threatening a British bird's survival, then I would ask you if you also believed in fairies. Just to take one of those countries to illustrate its specific attitude to bird life :
Freddy
Hi Freddy,
I only made those 2 points because at the time I couldn't think of a point relevant to the other side of the debate (in fact still can't).
1. Possibly no correlation but I could make a military analogy. Is there any difference to the victim(s) of being killed in a mass carpet bombing (Mink attack) or being picked off one by one by a sniper (the WH Duck dying out one mating session at a time!!)
They cease to exist under both scenarios!
2. The thought that other countries would introduce a cull as per the UK is, I agree, laughable but my question was theoretical and was suggesting that there was a touch of "it doesn't really matter what happens to the WH Duck they aren't British" in the anti-cull camp. My point still applies though, would any of our feelings be the same if a much loved British bird was being threatened by a similar species from overeseas
Note: Tongue was in cheek whilst writing most of the above!!
James