The Lincolnshire Bird Club

The LBC Forum. To register on this forum YOU must NOW be a member of the LBC - see Membership Page for details.
To join the LBC Forum you must be a Member of the Lincolnshire Bird Club - Click here for Membership Information
If you would like to post an item, but ARE NOT a forum member please submit information using the Record Form: if suitable the information will be posted on the LBC Forum on your behalf.

It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:09 pm

LBC Homepage - The Photo Album - Submit a Record (for Non-members)/ or Request - LBC Forum Information and Access Help - Forum Information


All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Do you support the Ruddy Duck Cull?
Poll ended at Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:29 pm
Yes 8%  8%  [ 5 ]
No 46%  46%  [ 28 ]
Yes but its gone far enough and should now be stopped 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Yes, the risk to White headed Duck overrides other considerations 16%  16%  [ 10 ]
No, its a beautiful bird and deserves protection 10%  10%  [ 6 ]
No, its an appalling waste of public money 18%  18%  [ 11 ]
Total votes : 61
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:24 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 11:10 am
Posts: 987
Location: humberston
the scientific community must learn to take us mere mortals along with them not make decisions on their behalf and then ignore the many widespread objections. grey squirrel bang lets have our reds back also no objection to mink being shot as they are now but our ruddy duck harms nothing here. hence my comment about only 4 white heads in 40 years. the thought of defras gunmen on our sacred land mean't to protect is beyond belief. our charming little blue billed fellow is the only duck that does something other than quack, it has character,look at me am i not great. leave him alone let them deal with a problem if they care about their own wildlife. non native species i have no problem with if they do no harm it surely enriches our what little we have left. we desperately need a major predator to control deer lets have wolf back. instead of spending the money on our charming chap where they also collect black necked grebe as a by product, spend the money on getting red squirrel back. ps keep up the good work in south america, all the best alex :wink:

terry whalin :D :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:59 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:13 pm
Posts: 316
Location: New Mills, Derbyshire
Hi Terry

Thanks for the sentiments!

Terence Whalin wrote:
the scientific community must learn to take us mere mortals along with them not make decisions on their behalf and then ignore the many widespread objections. grey squirrel bang lets have our reds back also no objection to mink being shot as they are now but our ruddy duck harms nothing here. hence my comment about only 4 white heads in 40 years. the thought of defras gunmen on our sacred land mean't to protect is beyond belief. our charming little blue billed fellow is the only duck that does something other than quack, it has character,look at me am i not great. leave him alone let them deal with a problem if they care about their own wildlife. non native species i have no problem with if they do no harm it surely enriches our what little we have left.


If Ruddy Ducks stayed in the UK then maybe they wouldn't be a problem, unfortunately that's not the case and we end up exporting a big problem elsewhere. I think Grey Squirrels are charming and there are plenty of people who keep ferrets who would argue that mink make lovely pets but then they still cause massive problems. Other effects are more insidious, the populations of feral geese in lowland Britain are contributing massively to eutrophication issues and threaten the integrity of many wetlands (farmers also massively to blame through runoff).

Terence Whalin wrote:
we desperately need a major predator to control deer lets have wolf back. instead of spending the money on our charming chap where they also collect black necked grebe as a by product, spend the money on getting red squirrel back. ps keep up the good work in south america, all the best alex :wink:


I agree completely on the deer front. I walked around Minsmere last xmas and it was sad to see the that the woodland in the RSPB's flagship reserve could be best described as 'disaster requiring a miracle'. The browse line was totally evident and the last time I was there in spring it was obvious that the herb layer was totally overgrazed; is it no surprise therefore that Nightingales are in massive decline nationally? The most obvious lifeforms running around were Grey Squirrels, Muntjacs and Pheasants. The first two of these are also major nest predators. Our own work in small forest fragments in the Amazon shows that bird reproductive success in such sites is super low because of huge populations of capuchin monkeys, Didelphis opossums and armadillos (all egg predators) owing to the historical extinctions of their own predators.

Threefold remedy

1) explain to gamekeepers that although Goshawks (ahhh) eat Pheasants they also eat loads of other species that either eat Pheasants (corvids), damage crops (woodpigeons) or damage woodlands (Grey Squirrels) and that the loss of some Pheasants is for the greater good.

2) Organise a massive mandatory nationwide eating exotics event, with lots of venison stew, squirrel burgers and maybe a nice Ruddy Duck a l'orange for the fortunate few.

3) Wolves (although this is even more unlikely apparently than me convincing you lot about the sense behind the Ruddy cull....)

Alex

_________________
Dr Alexander C. Lees
Lecturer in tropical ecology
Manchester Metropolitan University

Lab Associate
Cornell Lab of Ornithology,
Cornell University

http://www.freewebs.com/alexlees/index.htm
@Alexander_Lees


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:22 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 8:08 am
Posts: 340
Location: Cleethorpes
Nick Clayton wrote:
Freddy Johnson wrote:
I don't know about anyone else 'listening', Alex. I think we may be the only two still awake.


I for one am still listening; it’s nice to have an intelligent view from a qualified scientist for a change.

I agree with you Nick, it's been good to read an alternative reasoned view rather than the "Ruddy Duck is soooo cute we musn't harm them" opinion. :wink: Though a lot of content was too intelligent for me to fully take in!! :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:15 am 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:20 pm
Posts: 446
Location: Fulbeck
Well I am still listening and I must say that it is great to have some science injected into this debate to balance the emotion. However the points made by Alex and others (with which I agree) about many introduced species having a devastating effect on our indigenous wildlife (including a great number of plant species introduced for ornamental or financial benefit) are perhaps outweighed by the massive effect modern farming has here. Living in the middle of a large arable farming area it distresses me greatly to see hedgerows slashed to no more than a few bare branches and field margins reduced to a metre or less of sterile grass - no wonder species diversity and density are falling off the proverbial cliff. Even though the Government are attempting to address this issue with Stewardship schemes etc., I have seen a decline in quality of the countryside for wildlife in only the five years I have lived in Lincolnshire. The bird species count in my garden on the edge of farmland here is in the order of twenty whereas in my urban garden where I lived before in Derbyshire I had counted thirty four. Doesn't prove a thing and is wholly unscientific but nevertheless it is a trend that worries me.

Regards

David


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:06 am 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:13 pm
Posts: 316
Location: New Mills, Derbyshire
David Morison wrote:
Well I am still listening and I must say that it is great to have some science injected into this debate to balance the emotion. However the points made by Alex and others (with which I agree) about many introduced species having a devastating effect on our indigenous wildlife (including a great number of plant species introduced for ornamental or financial benefit) are perhaps outweighed by the massive effect modern farming has here. Living in the middle of a large arable farming area it distresses me greatly to see hedgerows slashed to no more than a few bare branches and field margins reduced to a metre or less of sterile grass - no wonder species diversity and density are falling off the proverbial cliff. Even though the Government are attempting to address this issue with Stewardship schemes etc., I have seen a decline in quality of the countryside for wildlife in only the five years I have lived in Lincolnshire. The bird species count in my garden on the edge of farmland here is in the order of twenty whereas in my urban garden where I lived before in Derbyshire I had counted thirty four. Doesn't prove a thing and is wholly unscientific but nevertheless it is a trend that worries me.

Regards

David


Totally agree David, declines in common farmland birds are likely to be predominantly driven by land-use changes (hedgerow removal, suburban expansion) and farm regime changes (lack of stubbles, winter cereal use), plus high populations of meso-predators (e.g. corvids) which can easily 'trap-line' existing habitats to rob eggs (imagine how easy ot must be them to find nests in modern farm landscapes that offer so few opportunities for nesting). Meanwhile woodland birds are threatened by changes in habitat wrought by exotic deer, changes in management practices (e.g. less coppicing) and predation by meso-predators (squirrels, corvids etc). Your example is perfectly fine, large parts of South Lincs are among the most ecologically sterile areas of Western Europe. Ironic obviously as once upon a time they would have played host to the richest community in the UK, huge bog oak forests and expansive fenland. Great news then that moves are being made to turn back time (see the stilt thread). In the 13 years I lived in Foston (1987-1998) it was possible to watch the local extinction of several species - the last Tree Sparrows in the village disappeared when the farm at the end of the village was sold off as housing plots, with it went the stack yard that they used to forage in and the tree that they used to nest in across the road was rooted out. Sad times.

_________________
Dr Alexander C. Lees
Lecturer in tropical ecology
Manchester Metropolitan University

Lab Associate
Cornell Lab of Ornithology,
Cornell University

http://www.freewebs.com/alexlees/index.htm
@Alexander_Lees


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:10 am 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:20 pm
Posts: 446
Location: Fulbeck
And don't let us forget the estimated 50 million birds killed each year in the UK by domestic cats (Chris Packham's numbers). Any club members own a cat or two?

David


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:46 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:37 pm
Posts: 1662
Location: Lincoln
Domesticated vermin :twisted:

Can never understand why a conservationist would have a pet Cat ?

_________________
Regards
Dean Eades

Image

Take nothing but photos - Leave nothing but footprints - Waste nothing but time

My website: http://www.birdmad.com
https://www.facebook.com/dean.eades1
http://www.flickr.com/photos/birdmad/
http://www.lcegroup.co.uk
http://www.Canon.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:00 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 11:10 am
Posts: 987
Location: humberston
i will sign off from this subject now having fully aired my views and reasons for them, keep up the good work alex (long live ruddy ducks and antbirds) as for cats well i have not got one now but i have always been a pussy man, :lol: :lol: :lol: :oops: =P~

terry whalin :D :wink: :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:37 pm
Posts: 1662
Location: Lincoln
:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Regards
Dean Eades

Image

Take nothing but photos - Leave nothing but footprints - Waste nothing but time

My website: http://www.birdmad.com
https://www.facebook.com/dean.eades1
http://www.flickr.com/photos/birdmad/
http://www.lcegroup.co.uk
http://www.Canon.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:12 am 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:30 pm
Posts: 2385
Dean Eades wrote:
Domesticated vermin :twisted:

Can never understand why a conservationist would have a pet Cat ?




Miaow :!:

_________________
GETTING OLD HAS IT'S ADVANTAGES BUT I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT THEY ARE lol


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites