Mike Tarrant wrote:
I was birdwatching alone at Pyes' Hall <snip> obviously a bunting and a rustic-looking bunting <snip> Always reluctant to put any news out until I am 100% sure, I said nothing wanting to check confirmatory features with reference material at home. Although it looked a good case for Rustic, winter buntings can be a trap for the unwary <big snip>.
Hi Mike.
On nodding terms with you today thanks to Anthony telling me names of who was present at Pyes this morning.
Wish I had spoken to you now but you were a little busy with the Yellow-browed at the time.
I fully understanding what your saying about being sure about the I.D but really do wish you'd mentioned it this morning to the birders present. We could have looked at the camera shots together and then all looked for your Rustic bunting! Pity.
There's no shame in getting It wrong, we've all been there Mike.
I know from experience what its like to be 200% sure of the ID of a bird. by coincidence also at Donna Nook one late afternoon. I reported it ASAP but it wasn't seen again next day.
Asked to submit the record, I did only to have it rejected. The reasons given were a joke but such is life.
Re: Second. unidentified bird at Pyes today.
Anthony and I spoke with another birder later, whose name I unfortunately didn't get.
He showed us a blown up and rather haze looking picture of a bird he had a fleeting glimpse of but managed to get a shot off with it in the corner of the frame. Hence the blown up hazey comment.
That blurred image is driving me crazy now & I wish I'd looked closer now.
I wonder if that's 2 that got away today at Pyes?